Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

BAHMAN KHAN versus MUHAMMAD KHAN


Section 8 and 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Article 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Title and possession of suit property, the present findings of facts by the courts below the sale process, evidence to the plaintiff The demand-for-trial case in which defendants resisted interest based on the sale agreement in favor of their predecessor was defendant's failure to prove the trial court's decision and The decision and order were upheld by the appellate court. Also, in the light of the evidence of the parties, the Hydrate Hydrate on behalf of the High Court correctly stated that the final results of fact were well established by the two courts below, and that the basis for the decision between the parties regarding the question of title. Question and the High Court had made the matter. Detailed review request for this question was deleted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.