BAHMAN KHAN versus MUHAMMAD KHAN
Section 8 and 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Article 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Title and possession of suit property, the present findings of facts by the courts below the sale process, evidence to the plaintiff The demand-for-trial case in which defendants resisted interest based on the sale agreement in favor of their predecessor was defendant's failure to prove the trial court's decision and The decision and order were upheld by the appellate court. Also, in the light of the evidence of the parties, the Hydrate Hydrate on behalf of the High Court correctly stated that the final results of fact were well established by the two courts below, and that the basis for the decision between the parties regarding the question of title. Question and the High Court had made the matter. Detailed review request for this question was deleted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer