GHULAM SARWAR versus ALLAH YAR
Controversial Possession of Recovery from Occupation of Sections 8 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 28 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the Appeal Court affirmed, but the reviewing jurisdiction In the exercise of the power, the High Court restored the same and the case was ordered by the defendant Pulia raised it as a denial of the integration of Islam of section 28 of the present case limitation Act, 1908. First filed, the negative ownership question was a pure question which must be proved by forceful and reliable evidence like this S in the absence of evidence, a continuous and uninterrupted possession for a long time, will not be enough to establish title against the interests of the true owner.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Mustang lawyer