Of the four accused named in the Section 11 Defamation Code (XLV of 1860), section 365 FIR, in their statement listed under section 164, the alleged abductor, CRPC did not designate the three suspects but rather abducted them. Not only did the car accuse the fourth suspect for the commission of the crime, but at the trial he also gave an authentic and rational account in which the kidnapper's statement was not only according to the prosecution's version, but also his Accordingly, section 161 and section 164 were consistent with their earlier statements under CRPC. The kidnapper's testimony also supported other evidence, and it was credible that the fourth suspect said that although the fourth suspect was named by the kidnapper, any allegations against her were attempted by the commission of adultery or for adultery. Was not brought.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
