Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJID versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Applicant representing the integration of the Preamble Arms Rules, 1924 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203d Islam, held that every citizen was entitled to the protection of his life and his weapon in nature. Had to be kept Therefore, for this purpose, there was no need for a license to possess firearm weapons, as made under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 and the Arms Rules, 1924, and for a grant of licenses in this regard. There was also an annual fee. ValidityHold, the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 and the Arms Rules, 1924, were widely opposed to the general welfare and security of the Ummah, which was not against the integration of the Islam Ordinance and under the rules. There is no ban on having weapons. The purpose of protecting self-esteem as well as honor and property, however, as highlighted in its offering, is only to strengthen the law on sales, transport, bearing or posing. Ammunition for military stores appears to regulate the possession of weapons, etc., by making certain rules for the same purpose of ammunition, ordinance and regulations, and thus, checking the abuse. Is done. People are properly protected In this regard, receiving annual fees for licensing was not in violation of the principles of Islam. criminal advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer