Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MESSRS CH. FABRICS PVT. LTD., HATTAR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD


Section 3 1 (a), 3 b (1) and 34 Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Tax jurisdiction Income tax adjustment Sales tax Input tax was collected. The adjustment was claimed by the Wapda as the sales tax credited thus and accordingly the taxpayers did not deduct the input tax which resulted in the demand for such principal amount along with additional tax. Was made while paying some extra tax. Paying the rest of the surplus tax, the assessee claimed that Wapda was responsible for paying the sales tax instead of refunding the same and thus was not liable to pay the additional tax such additional tax. This amount was demanded through a speaking order

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Liaquat Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.