Find a Lawyer

SHEHBAZ ALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 392 and 382 bail, the grant of further investigation of the accused, who allegedly seized the cash from the complainant, was not mentioned in the FIR , Both the suspects were arrested in another case and whatever they confessed to or disclosed to the police, it would be unacceptable to prove that the confession was a crime before the police denial and the number of alleged cash seized. The FIR was not given, the alleged money recovery was made from both the accused, they will not be linked to stolen cash. The suspects were transported from one city to another and were jailed the next day for holding an identity parade where the complainant and the prosecution witnesses allegedly identified the magistrate. It was recorded in the identification parade that when the suspects were shifted from one city to another, they were shown to the prosecutor's witnesses who were left and their photographs were taken at the police station, Facts, initiatives have made the identity parade proceedings a matter of further investigation; no further concrete material was charged against the accused, they were admitted on bail. lawer from fb area from Buchay Key lawyer