ABDUL LATIF versus MST. PARVEEN
The plaintiff in her suit filed for marriage dispute in Article 5 and Schedule Constitution (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition suit of the Constitution of Pakistan prayed that the defendant be banned from claiming as his wife. The plaintiff had divorced the plaintiff and after the divorce she had contracted a second marriage. In accordance with Muslim law with another person and also a daughter was born to be a plaintiff from her other husband, which was claimed by the plaintiff and under which the courts rendered the verdict simultaneously and the defendant filed the judgment. A constitutional petition was filed against the decisions. Only under the technicalities, there will be no beneficial purpose for both parties and this will give rise to injustice as the daughter who is sued by the other husband will be named son without her fault. The defendant was merely following the constitutional request to keep the flag of honor high and high, otherwise he knew the outcome and the result of the reversal of the decisions and decrees, the High Court refused to interfere with the decisions and decrees of the courts. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Bhuawana lawyer