GUL MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Section 382B and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (B) extending the benefit of section 382B, the PC accused was convicted under Section 302 (B), PPC and trial. The court sentenced him to life imprisonment. , But he did not challenge it before the High Court accused him of demanding an extension of Section 382B, CCPC's profit, because of the question of whether it was legally legal. The decision can be made only after the applicant's hearing without issuing any notice to the defendant, especially when the trial court had a duty to extend the accused's benefit to Section 382B, CR PC. It cannot be ruled out for reasons of record that the trial court did not touch or discuss the issue with the High Court. The hereditary powers were able to benefit the accused in Section 2B2B, according to the CCP, adding that the accused was extended with the instruction that his detention period as a detainee be counted. His punishment ward
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer