MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Bail, Sessions Court's cancellation granted the defendant's guarantee that he did not fire and wound the feet of the injured witness, namely, his body. The important part of the case, such as Section 242424, requires serious consideration of the PPC plea case; the doctrine of session court formation was not invalid, even one of the reasons recognized in the law for granting relief to the accused. Sure enough, no case for cancellation of the bail was dropped and accordingly the petition was dismissed in the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Cherat lawyer
