Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR AHMAD versus STATE

The testimony of section 2 30b (b) of the evidence fully corroborated the evidence of the four independent prosecution witnesses that it was the accused who, in fact, fired the deceased, and the death of the deceased on the evidence of that death. The result was that it was said that witnesses were, and were, individually competent. The credible trial court correctly relied on these testimonies as medical evidence ha! Providing full support to the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution's four witnesses on record, the duration of the casualty's injury was almost the same as that seen in the evidence presented by the prosecution's witnesses and the medical evidence and circumstances. There was no dispute between the evidence, the prosecution's witnesses were independent witnesses and there was no cause for false dismissal against the accused and an empty stand was established from the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses, there is nothing in the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses. Was found to be suspected to have been recovered, which is in accordance with the circumstances of the There is strong evidence for the Services. The positive thing about the use of weapons and the vacancy was the absence of a motive There was no room for the prosecution to completely abolish the widow and the victim's daughter could not be presented through prosecution under evidence as they were aliens. , Returned to their home country Non-product The case of these women was not present at the time: All life-threatening evidence for the prosecution has gone beyond any doubt of the evidence that the accused has committed the murder of the accused. The history, history and evidence of its place was substantiated by the evidence of the witnesses to whom the prosecution had substantially proved. The crime of the accused on record registration advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer