WAHEED AHMED KHAN versus PRINCIPAL SINDH MEDICAL COLLEGE
Section 3 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Article 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Applicable Luxury Possession of Medical Institutions Medical College, Applicability of High Court Constitutional Jurisdiction The candidates complained that they were Was given. Admissions and going to their classes, regularly paying their dues and taking exams When college officials issued notices to cancel their admissions, the candidates claimed admission against merit seats. , Their intermediate numbers were less than the closing number of the admission session. Entry did not appear in the test nor did their names appear in the list of applicants for admission to the relevant academic session nor were they on the list of successful candidates for the admission list at Sindh Medical College by the selection board. Were included It was through the candidates that once they were even admitted, they could not be withdrawn on the basis of the principle of justification of lok punctuality where there was a claim for admission error, where the college staff was found. The principle of Lux punctuality could not be applied on the basis of examination forms with Bhagat. In particular, this right cannot be asserted when the candidate fails to show his eligibility for admission in his statement, either because he is lacking closing numbers or in the jurisdiction of the second province of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Of nature and the High Court denied jurisdiction in cases where such jurisdiction would help or protect someone from injustice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Haveli Lakha lawyer