Find a Lawyer

PAHNA AND OTHERS versus MEMBER (CONSOLIDATION) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB

Article 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Objection of Stabilization Scheme The previous occupation of the parties was consolidated in two places The large plot was at the place where the applicant had held a large part of his land before the consolidation proceedings. ? The applicant said that the previous occupation of the parties was not taken into account by the authorities, while affecting stability, the applicant of the consolidation was benefited from stability and there was no reduction in his entitlement, rather than terms. I was raised more than 12 times according to the constitutional jurisdiction. The Class 1 High Court had rightly rejected the applicant's request for allotment of land of his choice. The question was decided by the Revenue Authority and High. There was no illegal interference by the judge in the courtroom chamber. Appeal denied law websites from Chaman lawyer