NAZIR MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Section 302/34 filed the FIR within 45 minutes of the firing incident immediately after the definition of evidence, excluding any possibility of consultation or deliberation for the purpose of selecting the accused complainant, whose In the presence of the man was controversial, he was targeted when presented as a witness. For a lengthy and cross-examination, but nothing can be said about the prosecution, the complainant tested the test thoroughly and was able to establish the broad features of the case, and the pistol. He was shot and charged with the recovery of 30 sacks. By chance, the medical report that supported his version was in no way contradictory to the account of Acolyte, and by accepting the suggestion that the physician's injury could have been to a higher degree, It will not be enough to terminate the ocular account
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Poonch lawyer
