WAJID versus THE STATE
Charges were not filed in the FIR filed immediately on the refusal of the accused, Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 bail. There was ample ocular evidence only to support them. The prosecution's version, but it was also supported by medical evidence, injuries sustained on the victims and the victims, did not appear as an action by any of the accused, even after the accused, the incident took place 8 months. Been fugitive for more than Under Section 87/88 // ?44, the CCPC, which distinguished its case from other co-accused, on whom the active role of killing or injuring someone with a knife was a prima facie case against the accused. His appeal was denied, his appeal was rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Chashma lawyer
