Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus SHEIKH RIAZ-UD-DIN

A. XXXVII, R2 Stamp Act (II of 1899), Section 12 (2) except for O XXXVII, R 2, CPC, in which the promissory note and receipt were prepared. The stamps were not canceled and so the promissory note continues. Note was not admissible in the evidence and could not be made on the basis of this decree. The validity stamp was put on by the validity stamp, which the defendant himself signed and 21 stamps worth 40 paise each were not canceled. No objection was raised at the time of the hearing of the defendant; a literate man requested that he sign the proportional and receipt as a minor witness stamp affixed to the receipt and that Mittal could not be denied. If the defendant objected at the appropriate time, it could be reversed. The recovery of stamp duty by the court was a matter between the citizen and the state plaintiff famous supreme court advocate from Depal Pur lawyer