Find a Lawyer

MESSRS KAM INTERNATIONAL, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Section 10 Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) CBR Letter C No. 2 (7) STP / 99PT, 10 10 2002 Extra money forward in history Claims to be extended or returned for suspicious unit return The complainant was prevented from issuing a notice without cause and the complainant was declared as suspicious unit as there were only four purchases from the supplier , Despite the fact that the payment was made by cross check. If the accuracy of the banking channels was fraudulent to a supplier, the buyer should not have been included in the suspicious list unless collusion was established and there was evidence that the transaction was fraudulent. It was issued in this regard that if there was solid evidence against the complainant, they should have been disclosed as well, given the opportunity for the accused to appear in the showcase notice and represent their case. The situation led to a one-sided action by the department to condemn the complainant to a suspected category, to refuse a refund without any action and to harass them. The Board of Revenue directed that refund claims should not be denied for some suspected receipts, and refunds cannot be granted only to the extent of counterfeit receipts, and the remaining amount approved The directive was breached by the sales tax authorities. , Proceedings and proceedings were invasive because they were arbitrary, based on speculative and irrelevant grounds, which proved to be unfair and oppressively overly manageable. famous lower court advocate from Khanewal lawyer