Find a Lawyer

S.M. ISMAIL versus C.D.A.

Section 49 (b) Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance (IV 2001), Sections 4, 17 (1), 1 (2), 2 (k) and (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition on Compensation Emissions. The Capital Capital Development Authority, which was given a lease of the plot to the applicant, gave the CDA employees' welfare committee so that the proceeds from the plot could be used for welfare purposes, and said that the committee was concerned about the day's affairs. Of great importance. Regarding the aforesaid plot, the applicant stated that the person who obtained the lease from the Staff Welfare Committee was to proceed with the removal of the plot at the end of the CDA without any proper decision in relation to the abandonment of the plot. Was done On behalf of the applicant through the Welfare Committee, the applicant had further alleged that the authorities, under the influence of some political figures in the CDA, wanted to take over the plot and lease it to someone secretly. Om officials were instructed to adjust the legitimate property, which is undoubtedly the Capital Development Authority and was entrusted to the Welfare Committee, CDA for welfare purposes, so it had some role in the matter. It was possible that the CDA was used to oust the power. The applicant was working within the notice welfare committee Capital Development Authority at the relevant time and was such an institution because the CDA could not be said as a component of it, because the CDA had delegated some powers to the committee. ? Practical role for dealing with the plot and using its funds for the welfare purposes of the Constitutional petition against the Welfare Committee, when you need a advocate from Khangah Sharif lawyer