Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD


Section 9 Jurisdiction, Federal Tax Ombudsman Options and Options Section R860 (I) / 2003 Section RO 707 (I) / 2003, dated 12 7 2003 for extension of return submission time by review application 90 On the day of the review year 2002, due to the inconvenience caused by the complaints, these findings were acknowledged in the decision / decision and some recommendations were made so that such situation does not arise in the future. The points that were considered were already given and it was beyond the scope of review that the filing date for the assessment year 2002 was 2002. Playa was not currently realistic for a 90-day extension The Federal Tax Ombudsman did not find any reason to amend the results / decision. The matter was closed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Padidan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.