MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DOR
Civil Pro Code of Civil Procedure (v. 1908), O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 Acquisition of Proprietary Rights Temporary Order Prohibition, Approval of Applicant's Suit Member's Board of Revenue and Temporary Order Prohibition Rejected by Civil Court and Appeal done. Applicants' judicial view was that they were granted land by temporary lease in the dispute, after which they were granted property rights by the provincial government, legally acquired for the disputed land development authority, Therefore, there will be a surplus of land applicants, in the present case, have specifically stated that they were tenants and that landowners cannot be adjusted only in favor of landowners, and applicants. , Cannot be granted proprietary rights to any third party because the land below is not owned by the provincial government courts. The orders of the courts below were based on an accurate definition of the facts and circumstances of the case, and the High Court found no material irregularities in the exercise of jurisdiction over which the review was excluded.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
