Find a Lawyer

SAKHI MUHAMMAD versus STATE

On the transfer of the orders of Sections 1 561A, 200 and 202, the petitioner alleged that the policemen had brutally killed two persons in an alleged police encounter and claimed that they had made their inquiry before the Judicial Magistrate. Provided evidence, which made a negative comment. An inquiry report made under Section 202, CR PC was presented to the Sessions Judge who dismissed the complaint. The respondents alleged that the judicial inquiry found that the incident was a genuine police encounter and that the police killed the accused. What was, none of the victims were involved. The case of his entire life, while the second was a criminal and the police did not mention that a pistol was also recovered from the victim's body which was not involved in any of the cases. That the body of the rifle was lying besides. The other man, who was convicted, was found to have been both gundown from 1 1/2 miles away, and was not discussed nor brought to the record that a shoplifting incident occurred and police The bullets fired by the victim were also targeted on a wall or shopper and no one was found scratching the policemen, who were 17, who were stripped of the scene. The firearm specialist was not sent with a rifle and both of the victim's pistols to determine whether they had opened fire or not. Prima faces that the respondents are being prosecuted and the sessions court ordered the trial. They will be given the opportunity to present their evidence before. In the circumstances, separate the judge best advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer