Find a Lawyer

KASHIF ALIAS KASHI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 394/411 bail, further investigation grant accused was not named as one of the perpetrators of the alleged FIR, but his name The first case in which the accused was allegedly revealed to the police about three months after the alleged disclosure was made, though the accused was rightly picked up in the identity parade, but the case against the accused was his co-accused. There was no reason why the accused could not be treated in the same way as the bail. The co-accused said, when neither the state nor the complainant had applied in any court and said that the co-accused challan had already been submitted after the completion of the investigation, the fulfillment of any beneficial purpose. In the unlikely event, the pre-conviction case should not be barred from calling the exempt accused in the bail. For further investigation in hh, Section 497, CR is guilty of sub-section (2) of the PC, it is found I was admitted on bail best law firms from Mubarik Pur lawyer