MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BAHAWALPUR
The former part decree, suit, for the recovery of the amount of Article, Section 185 (3), and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), keeping aside the defendant's plea, was that there were two cases pending against him. The court is in front of a hearing to recover the door. And to recover the other damages, that was the impression that both crazy suits were stabilized. Since the damages case was dismissed for non-prosecution, it assumed that the case for Dover was also dismissed, the trial court dismissed the former Parliament decree for not showing good cause. The application was dismissed and the constitutional application filed by the plaintiff was rejected by the Appellate Court and the High. The court, respectively, granted the trial court no formal order for the stability of the two cases.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Sohawa District Daska lawyer
