Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD BOOTA versus SARDAR MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS


Section 44 & Civil Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Suit Permanent and Compulsory Order Withholding Suit As well as the trial court and the appellate court ruling simultaneously, the two courts were acting in concurrent decisions. Serious legal errors were made that not only allowed the record to disappear completely. The matter was not sustainable in the law but both the courts had committed illegality and material irregularities and the decisions made by wrong reading and non-reading of wrong decisions were not sustainable in the law and were reviewed by the High Court. An intervention was called. The jurisdiction of the courts below was set aside and the parties were asked to dismiss oral and documentary evidence in support of their argument.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Patika lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.