The legality of appellant's predecessor, appellant's prediction against section (()), was that he was entitled to serve notice in the prescribed manner in each newspaper. ???? Due to the misnomer's mention in the same hold, the appellant's banking order was set aside without first ensuring that the appropriate notice was issued in the prescribed manner on each of them. And the appellants were traced to them. Be entitled to apply for leave and to defend the case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
