FAZAL AHMAD THROUGH HAMIDAH BEGUM versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN
After the Declaration of Section 7 Financial Institutions (Restoration of Finance) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), Section 5 of the preceding and closed cases was passed by the Banking Tribunal, under which the High Court passed certain provisions and notifications of the Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984. Was declared. The appointment of the Presiding Officers of this tribunal was not included in the savings clause provided in the aforesaid decision, unconstitutional and without legal authority, because the aforesaid clause of the superior court's decision was not to affect past and closed cases or the decisions were invalid. Didn't have to give / Orders, which were finalized, remanded in banking court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Patoki lawyer
