SHABBIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
In section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (i), F (v), 342/506 bail, the grant of the role of the accused in the FIR was not granted to any person who was injured. There was no common intention for the prima to occur. The accused complained of hurting the complainant was empty-handed and did not cause any harm to the complainant. No good reason for deprivation could be used, yet the accused had a common intention. After recording the evidence of the prosecution witnesses to be considered by the relevant competent court, it seemed that the accused was a retaliatory attack, the accused was not charged under section 324, further investigation in PPC case The fact that the accused's name was listed in the FIR does not mean that he could be denied bail privilege, irrespective of the facts and circumstances of the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Tank lawyer
