MESSRS ATTA ULLAH ZIA versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 14, 25, 32 and 81 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Deliberate delays in defamation by customs authorities misinterpretation of law provision finally declared And the certification of approval was issued which was not honored by the Port Trust Authority of Charges of Duty charges. Customs authorities assessed the appropriateness of the goods as being unnecessarily delayed. Complaint / importer delay request not finalized under section 81 of the Customs Act, 1969 due to processing by customs authorities It was acknowledged by the acclaimed Air and Assistant Collector that the complainant / importer was entitled to delay and detention period which would be from 27 3 2003 to 24 4 2003. The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the Central Board of Revenue instruct collector Customs to issue revised delays and detention certificates within 15 days for the aforementioned period and advise the Port Authorities of the charges of mitigation. And return the same to the complainant / importer.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Dhoun Kal lawyer