Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAIK MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus THE STATE


Section 302 (b) definition of evidence The testimony of the ocular witnesses and the statements of eyewitnesses was reliable The witnesses had no motive to falsely implicate the accused in this case Identity testing was not necessary in this case because the prosecution witnesses Not only were there ample opportunities available, the accused's face was seen very clearly but they were able to remember his face as well and the indictment of the complainant records indicate that the accused was arrested. At the time of the incident, the accused was provoked and did not make any such request. It was taken during his trial, there was no case of sudden and serious provocation, therefore, the accused was presented in favor of the sentence and the accused's sentence was upheld.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Cherat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.