NAIK MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) definition of evidence The testimony of the ocular witnesses and the statements of eyewitnesses was reliable The witnesses had no motive to falsely implicate the accused in this case Identity testing was not necessary in this case because the prosecution witnesses Not only were there ample opportunities available, the accused's face was seen very clearly but they were able to remember his face as well and the indictment of the complainant records indicate that the accused was arrested. At the time of the incident, the accused was provoked and did not make any such request. It was taken during his trial, there was no case of sudden and serious provocation, therefore, the accused was presented in favor of the sentence and the accused's sentence was upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Baroute lawyer
