Find a Lawyer

FAHIM-UL-HAQ AND OTHERS versus THE STATE

Sections 30 302, 30, 7 307/34, 4 394 and 99 / evidence evidence Appraising evidence The confessional statements of the accused facing many weaknesses were dismissed and the hearing was merely a link between the offense and The convictions were his confessional statements, as well as confessional statements of the accomplices, who could not be trusted for recovery, the accused could not be linked to the robbery of the robbery articles, the accused was acquitted. Was convicted after a trial and was absent. The trial court was similar to the case of the co-accused who was acquitted and consequently acquitted. advocate for immigration from Muzaffarabad lawyer