Find a Lawyer

NADEEM ANWAR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD

Bye 118 Syllabus and Scheme of Education and Training for Foundation and Professional Examinations, 1995, Para 9 2 4 Chartered Accountants Ordinance (X 1961), Sections 2 (G) and 27 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application PETITEONE cleared all the old scheme papers in the Intermediate Chartered Accountancy Examination Failed Subject in Group II of II, but failed to clear a new scheme paper in two schemes, the Institute Chartered Accountant asked the applicant third. Refused to be given the opportunity and directed to appear in all papers applying under the law The third opportunity was not available to them which was allowed by the High Court through an interim order. The Validate Petitioner cleared Group 1 under the old scheme, so it would be the case in Para-9 syllabus and by the Scheme of Education and Foundation and Training for Vocational Examinations, Bye Bye Law, 1983, of the 1995 Chartered Accountants. According to LA 118 first and second, there were efforts available to the applicant to clear two single papers, which he had already taken advantage of, such as the Bai-La, when the applicant was introduced under the old scheme in 1994. It was not surprising when it was registered and there was no question of such denial by the institute. It was within the jurisdiction of the law that the petitioner had obtained the third opportunity from the interim order of the High Court. After more than four years, the institute had not applied to withdraw such an interim order. Nor had I contacted any of the top forum candidates through this act of court. To the Institute jobs for fresh advocates from Miran Shah lawyer