WALAYAT versus THE STATE
The value of the evidence in section 302 (b) of the sentence was deducted from the same accused in the sentencing case, who was named in the instant-filed FIR cases, but only the way in which this happened has the accused prosecution case established. It was The trial court cannot interfere in finding the defendant guilty by means of a self-defense plea by the ocular account and medical evidence presented by the prosecution's witnesses, but the absence of evidence for the alleged motive by the prosecution I, it was not clear what had happened between the accused and the victim
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Tarbela lawyer
