NAVID AKHTAR versus MUHAMMAD SAEED KHAN AND ANOTHER
Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the basis of the defense work taken by the accused was declared as baseless because it merely proved by the evidence that it was irresponsible. Was unsuccessful, so much so that it did not even appear under section 4040 ((?)), the CCP was able to provide ocular testimony in support of the allegations or allegations leveled against him. It was believed that the manufacture of his licensed pistol from the accused to the crime emptied. Medical evidence along with the accused's licensed pistol prosecuted the prosecution's version. Yadav was confirmed, thus, that he did not prove or encourage the incident because of a sudden incident, nor did the trial court lower the accused who was lawful. As has been affirmed by the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
