MUHAMMAD ALI versus THE STATE
Section 426 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), sections 320 and 337A (i) the suspension of the sentence was adjourned during the trial until the decision of the appeal against the judgment of the trial court was made during the trial. The specialist was not tested. To prove whether it was the culprit or the driver of the bus in which the injured and the dead were traveling, the further argument was that the two injured witnesses, who were examined before the trial court, were the accused in the case. Was not brought to person but the state's lawyer did not oppose it. The accused's prayer for the suspension of sentence and the sentence imposed on the accused by the trial court were suspended till the decision of the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer