MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus THE STATE
Refusing my delay in recording the statements of the prosecution witnesses under Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 bail, section 161, the CRPC itself was not sufficient to grant the accused bail, Especially when eyewitnesses gave their reasons. Recording his statements late on the same day, the police party, headed by the accused, was arrested on the same day for the recovery of arms when the accused was arrested two days after filing an FIR, and upon his identification As police recovered blood stained clothes. It may be that the trial is concluded, the request for bail was dismissed with the direction of the trial court so that the trial could be concluded within the stipulated period.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Talagang lawyer
