MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus MST. HAFEEZAN THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
In section Q 42 of the Law of Martyrdom (of 1984 of 10), the plaintiff filed a claim for possession of evidence of the execution of the Power of Attorney, claiming that her father had 80 kanals and 6 marshes. Owned the property and never assigned the accused to his lawyer for sale. In the name of the other defendants, the alteration was fraudulent and fraudulent, and they were rendering their rights ineffective because the heirs of the deceased trial court concluded that the plaintiff's father was a legitimate power of attorney by the late father. Was executed and that the lawyer had a legitimate right in favor of the other defendants, the sale deed was executed on the suit ground which followed the mutation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Thatta lawyer
