Find a Lawyer

MESSRS HABIB OIL MILLS (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI versus TAXATION OFFICER

Sections 122 and 239 (4) Income Tax Rules, 2002, R68 Income Tax Ordinance (XXXX of 1979), Section 66 Establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000X of XXV), Section 2 (3) Evaluation saving operations The amendment was initiated on the basis of an inspection report by the Additional Commissioner inspecting under Section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, which was made after considering the evidence presented and the explanation presented in the investigation. The report was transferred to the Additional Director Inspection Jurisdiction. Under Section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the major taxpayer unit taxation officer issued the notice, pending proceedings under section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and the contents of the notice were the same as under the Income Tax Ordinance A. The notice states. Unsigned Record of Tax Ordinance, 1979. Accuracy The tax officer failed to prove proceedings under Section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Income Tax Ordinance was pending before his start in 2001 because of the order sheets found on record during his acquisition. The authenticity of the recorded facts was doubtful as to the fact that his predecessor terminated the proceedings. In addition to the Additional Director's Inspection, the Commissioner, under his own signature, had also provided a copy of such report to the complainant / reviewer through the Inspection Additional Commissioner Malmediation, communication of this decision proved that the tax at that time The officer and the inspecting additional commissioner were required to explain why the order sheet that was prepared during the investigation process was signed. law firms from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer