Find a Lawyer

ASLAM HASSAN QURESHI versus GOVERNOR, STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN AND 4 OTHERS

Section 41A & 41C Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution, Maintaining the Application Alternative Remedies The applicant was the Regional Manager of a Bank and the State Bank granted them the exercise of powers under Section 41A of the Ordinance of Banking Companies. Issued the showcase notice, the 1962 showcase notice was heard before the High Court under Article 199 of the constitution of the authorities that the applicant had alternative treatment under section 41C of the Ordinance of Banking Companies, The availability of appropriate alternative therapies was restricted to crafting. Under Article 199 of the Constitution and the absence of alternative remedies, it was regarded as a prerequisite for obtaining immunity from constitutional jurisdiction. The High Court had to be convinced that the appropriate treatment offered in this sense is, in fact, the only appropriate, equally fast, beneficial and effective treatment. The Appeal to the Central Board of Directors was an effective method for the banking companies' ordinance, section 41C (2) of 1962, consisting of highly qualified expert directors of the board petition, which had alternative remedies under the provisions of the law. Refused to exercise their constitutional jurisdiction. Aslam Traders made an arbitrary decision in the High Court, adhering to the Supreme Court's adherence to the case reported in the case of 2000 SCMR 65, commended the period and instructed the applicant to file the banking companies. Refer to the appropriate forum under Section 41C (2) of the Ordinance. , 1962 was dealt with accordingly power of attorney advocate Kacha Khooh lawyer