LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus ALI MUTTQI RIZVI THROUGH BASHIR AHMAD CHAUDHRY
OI, R 10 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), the necessary and appropriate party to the possession of suits 8 and 12, the implementation of the dispute of the defendant, the defendant was that the plaintiff did not act as the plaintiff in the case. What was, as is, property in it. The question was in the possession of the sinner, therefore, responsible for dismissing the case. Talasar was not the necessary and appropriate party to resolve the property dispute, on the basis of which both courts had filed. Affirmative facts were not denied by the defendant and the defendant that he was a misunderstanding of the property; therefore, he was not a necessary and proper party and he had no right to commit the property.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
