MESSRS MADINA RICE MILLS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Section 21 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24 An impugned reading and non-speaking order of evidence, the effect of the suit against the appellants for bankruptcy filing was dismissed, by the appellant. The appeal was filed against the trial court's defamation verdict. Accuracy The unwanted verdict was adopted in a slip way and was devoid of reasons. Under Section 24A of the Judges Clause Act, 1897, there was no speech order or judicial decree within the parameters of the law, provided that the authorities were required to state the reasons. The trial court had dealt with the matter without considering the parties' respective record requests, therefore, a wrong reading and non-reading or judgment of evidence and a trial court's decision cannot be sustained. ? The remand was obtained for a fresh verdict of the case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
