DR. MUHAMMAD AFZAL NASER versus MUHAMMAD AZAM AND 23 OTHERS
Article 30 (1) Prior to the pre-emptive limitation trial, the trial court ruled that the appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal stating that the writ was banned because on the handover of the shop owners on 19, 1968. The writ was banned, soot tea had entered the oil 20. 19 1969 and thus banned from time to time In 1915 the Repeat Daily presented a dispute of gratuity, it did not do any good because it was declared a sold process oil 209 1968 and the oil registered. The land was given to landowners oil, in which the date of implementation of process 20 68 1968 was correctly found by the appellate court that the case was within time.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
