Find a Lawyer

UNION BANK LIMITED THROUGH PRESIDENT versus ABDUL REHMAN

Sections 7 and 10 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), leave for defense of section 14, grant of suit for restitution were filed against the bank by the defendants as the latter filed an insulting demand draft in the account of the respondents. Had debited the amount of On the basis of the bank's leave to defend, it was claimed that the case was false and unreasonable and there was no privatization of the agreement because the bank acted as a respondent's agent with a third party. Had entered and submitted to religion. For the purpose of submitting the demand draft and the case was withheld by the trial court, the trial court dismissed the bank's request and moved the respondent bank's case against the trial court's decision in the trial court's appeal. , The bank's authenticity only acted as the defendant's agent to submit the demand draft; it was accepted by a third party who was not responsible for the bank's participation. By adjusting the payment thereby, the defendants recorded from the retained accounts, without any evidence. Dud could not be, within the period of limitation to bring Article 14 of Law, 1908. Limitations set by the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Financial Issues) Ordinance 2001, which was a special constitution, required a full trial. Was discharged and discharged for defense. To the bank, under the circumstances \ r \ n advocate from Satyana Bangla lawyer