ALLAH BACHAYO AND 3 OTHERS versus HAJI JARO AND ANOTHER
Sections 561A, 177 and 179 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the termination of section 380/34 proceedings were allegedly stolen from the territorial jurisdiction court and the accused have retained the alleged stolen articles. Articles B \ Complaint, either in the situation \ S \ or in the place \ B place in the court and the trial could have been filed in the court in which the complaint was filed directly by the complainant. There was no jurisdiction to sue on the spot. Due to the discharge of jurisdiction, the entire proceeding was invalidated, and after the prosecution of legal proceedings and legal facts, a prosecution case was faced, if no possibility of prosecution was brought in this case. If, then the trial is going on, the trial process will be misused. in D place The court proceedings against the accused were pending under section 380/34 PPC, in the circumstances they were dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Qambar lawyer
