HABIB BANK LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEYS versus MUHAMMAD ABDUL SAMAD KHAN AND ANOTHER
Article 212 (3) Bank employees were not presented with relevant notification regarding competent authority as well as the steps taken by the department as well as the penalties imposed on the employees were good and the decision of the service tribunal was self-explanatory and complete Was based on its proper definition. There is no important question about the law of public importance, the facts of the Supreme Court, the law and the decisions which were mentioned in this decision, which were considered to be included in the petitions under Article 2112 (3) of the Constitution. , Was deleted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Bahawalnagar lawyer
