MST. MUMLIKAT BEGUM versus MALIK NASRULLAH
Section 24 prepares a deposit of 1/3 of the pre-paid amount in one day by the court and the application for the return of the said application on the same day agrees with the advance umpire to submit the vacancy in advance. Timely application, but, knowing the consequences, had applied for premature deposit again on the same date, in the case of a trial, pending this application till the trial decision. There was no reason or logic. Request for extension because the application was completely redundant when the pre-emptor had agreed to deposit the amount of premature costs and then on the due date if the trial court had allowed, the pre-emptor
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Chitral lawyer
