Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus MUHAMMAD HANIF


Articles 13 (3) and 35 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 were filed on 31st 1988 1988 for a constitutional application for a writ of right. It was not appropriate on the basis that the learned counsel was not made in accordance with section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, giving notice to the other party for the protection of section 35 (2) of the Act. It is enough that in pre-emption suits, established between 1 8 1986 and 28 3 1990, it was sufficient for the competitor that he had made the accused in the presence of a true witness in such a rigorous way to prove the pre-emptor. There was no requirement that the notice of the student, in accordance with the provisions of section 13 (3) of the Act, as stated that the exemptions could not be applied prejudicially.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Matiari lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.