MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus MUHAMMAD HANIF
Articles 13 (3) and 35 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 were filed on 31st 1988 1988 for a constitutional application for a writ of right. It was not appropriate on the basis that the learned counsel was not made in accordance with section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, giving notice to the other party for the protection of section 35 (2) of the Act. It is enough that in pre-emption suits, established between 1 8 1986 and 28 3 1990, it was sufficient for the competitor that he had made the accused in the presence of a true witness in such a rigorous way to prove the pre-emptor. There was no requirement that the notice of the student, in accordance with the provisions of section 13 (3) of the Act, as stated that the exemptions could not be applied prejudicially.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Hyderabad lawyer
