NASRULLAH SAHITO versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, FOOD DEPARTMENT
RR 3, 4 (1) (B) (iv), 5, 7 and 8 of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act (XV of 1973), before the dismissal of section 4, the appellant was given a substantial dismissal. However, the dismissal order for filing an appeal against them was laid on the basis that he was involved in the case with other officers / officials. The appellant was already ordered to be reinstated in the job, though in the present case no order was initiated against the appellant to initiate fresh disciplinary proceedings. , For this reason he was issued a notice on the basis of which he was tried and charged with the same charge and was dismissed again, which was completely without legal authority. And had no legal effect, the nature of the charges against the appellant required. Full investigation, but instead a short procedure for issuing showcase notices was followed by final show cause notice
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Miran Shah lawyer
