HAJI BAHADAR HILAL versus ENGINEER MUHAMMAD AYUB
The trial court directed the plaintiff to submit one-third of the sale price for section 6, 13 and 24 pre-acquisition proceedings, adding that the third part of the sale, which was deposited at Rs 36 lakh and the plaintiff after submission, On the plea of the petitioner that the sale was a transaction of Rs. Setting a third amount under section 24 of the Impression Act, 1987, was temporary in nature and the purpose of section 24 was to have a vigil on the illegal suit and The court will proceed on the issue when adequate security was provided by the emperor in advance of the cash deposit, the actual value of the suit property was yet to be determined by the trial. After the recording of the evidence, the court will pay the umpire if he manages to establish his pre-discrimination right before the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer
