MUHAMMAD RUSTAM versus THE STATE
The accused was to be charged in connection with the section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Surrender of Illegal Weapons Act (XXI of 1991), Section 7 bail, on the record of grant of material on record, although designated in the FIR Was unknown and there were unknown suspects / criminals. Was nominated for the commission of the crime, but it is equally true that the prosecution had enough material to link the accused to the commission of the crime; the accused was arrested and captured two days after the incident. A pistol was recovered from, and an empty space was recovered from the penalty area. The pistol was sent to the firearms specialist for comment and a microscope examination revealed that the defendant's request for bail was fired from the pistol because of its merit and substance, he was fired. Was, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer