Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.760/KB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 2ND NOVEMBER, 2003. versus I.T.A. NO.760/KB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 2ND NOVEMBER, 2003.

Error correction of Section 156, 86 and 52 defect under section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, to be erroneously received by treating the Assessor as prescribed under Section 52A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Application for such additional tax adjustment / refund of such order under section 1 56 of Income Tax Ordinance 1979, 1979 without prior motion for cancellation of order sanctioned under section 86 of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Was paid by way of. And requested to adjust the amount related to section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, which was not legally possible due to the adjustment of the amount related to Section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and its return legally. It may be possible. The order under section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was canceled or by appeal or correction, the separate order under section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, separately under section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 It was approved to create an independent charge that was still in the field, Assisi moved a correction request in the evaluation process without seeking any relief against the order. Under section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which was still in the field, the SCI under section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, as assessed under Section 52A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 86 had to suffer as an additional tax due to the adjustment or wrongful adoption of tax payment. Income tax ordinance, under section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance of 1979 till the reforms in the 1979 field was such additional tax patent advocate from Tall lawyer