MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus THE STATE
In section 340 (2), 342, 364, 537 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the accused was examined in section 420 that, under examination under section 342, the CRPC filed section 340 (2), Cr. Did not raise any question on his statement. The PC under section 646464 (?) and the certificate required, Section 2342, even after the statement of the accused under CRPC, the PC was not included, which was an illegal 3737, was not treatable under the CRPC and that both the decisions of the courts are responsible for it. Section Act and the accused can be acquitted. Non-inclusion of the certificate required under section 364 ((?)), CR PC was merely irregular and the provisions of Section 373737, CRPC will be attracted and the accused at that point. The courts will be investigated in connection with the conviction. Cannot be changed or altered by the non-inclusion of the required certificate under section 6464 ((?)), as per the statement of the accused made under section 2342, CC. P was deadly and should have been ordered to sue
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Lalshanra lawyer
